Did you see the series of articles (by Errol Morris) about the photo of three children found on a dead (Civil War) solider? Read it. And then read the short piece a week ago in the New York Times last week (Lost in the Real World, Found via Cyberspace). The practice of searching for the owners of lost photos. . . Then and now. More on this later. I'd like a copy of that Philadelphia Inquirer article (Oct. 19, 1863). Human interest vs. the marvels of technology (and social networks).
From Whose Father Was He? (part 0ne)
"Because there was no way of printing photographs in a newspaper,
Bourns knew that he might need dozens if not hundreds of cartes de
visite to put the image of the three children before the eyes of
someone who knew them.
But the story had to be circulated as well, so the photographs were
supplemented by a series of newspaper articles, the most prominent of
which appeared in The Philadelphia Inquirer on Oct. 19, 1863, a little
over three months following the discovery of the ambrotype. It appeared
under the heading, 'Whose Father Was He?'"
------
from: Lost in the Real World, Found via Cyberspace
"Ms. Surman, who lives in northern Scotland, did not give up. There
were 600 pictures on the camera’s memory card, including some from a
wedding and a couple’s European travels. Ms. Surman posted several of
them on the Internet and, in the next few months, organized a group of
amateur detectives who traced clues in the photos, leading them back to
the camera’s stunned and delighted owner."
Recent Comments